Search for: "Seagate" Results 41 - 60 of 571
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am by Jason Rantanen
This past fall at the Administering Patent Law symposium at Iowa Law, Professor Colleen Chien presented an argument in favor of more intentional experimentation by administrative  agencies such, as the USPTO to test policy concepts and proposed several possibilities. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 am by The Murray Law Firm
Local News Security measures are in question after two men were shot “outside the Ocean Oaks Apartments, on Seagate Avenue near Penman,” November 12, 2018, according to First Coast News. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm by Dennis Crouch
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
., No. 17-1645 (does the “should have known” standard for willful infringement under Seagate meet the “intentional or knowing” requirement set forth in Halo v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 10:00 pm
In 2007, the In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:07 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Supreme Court delved into the evidentiary standard of clear and convincing evidence: The Seagate test is also inconsistent with §284 because it requires clear and convincing evidence to prove recklessness. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
Arctic Cat Inc. 17-1645 Issue: Whether a finding of willful infringement based on In re Seagate’s “should have been known” negligence standard violates the requirement that subjective willfulness must be “intentional or knowing,” as set forth by the Supreme Court in Halo Electronics Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 17-787 Google LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:15 am by Dennis Crouch
Edward was a patent attorney and chief patent counsel for Alliacense Limited LLC, and previously was chief IP counsel for Seagate Technology and Control Data. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 9:14 am by Dennis Crouch
Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 17-787 (Response Requested) AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 7:07 am by Docket Navigator
Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. et al, 2-16-cv-00538 (PAWD January 18, 2018, Order) (Bissoon, USDJ) [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:34 am by Dennis Crouch
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 2:15 am by Theodore Chiacchio
With two exceptions noted herein regarding the availability of enhanced damages for infringement occurring after suit has been filed, these cases do not provide much in the way of additional guidance other than re-tracing the evolution of the law governing egregiousness/willfulness and enhanced damages through Seagate and Halo and re-iterating the standards discussed in Halo. [read post]