Search for: "Seal 1 v. USA" Results 61 - 80 of 127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2012, 5:08 am by Anita Davies
The fourth appellant, Halligen, is a British citizen whose extradition is sought by the USA under Part 2 of the Extradition Act 2000. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:32 pm by Steve Vladeck
Thanks to the USA PATRIOT Act and the Sealed Case decision, however, the FIS exception recognized by the FISA Court of Review in In re Directives does not include a similar constraint. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:34 am by Rosalind English
It follows that the extradition proceedings against H fall within Article 6(1) [33]. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
(b) In T 1/97, which cited the two preceding decisions, the notice of appeal was filed in the name of the opponent; there was an inconsistency between the name indicated in the notice of appeal (“Crown Cork & Seal CO”) and the name taken from the appealed decision (“Crown Cork AGM). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
Specifically, as was also a problem in interferences, any derivation proceeding must be filed within 1 year. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pursuant to Rule 2.551(h)(1) of the California Rules of Court, "[a] sealed record must not be unsealed except on order of [*10] the court. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:47 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Pohl in the case USA v. al-Nashiri is now available here, and here is the substance of it: 1. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:40 am by Dental Library
Contact angle of 10 µl of distilled H2O and defibrinated horse blood of the titanium surfaces was measured using image analyzer (ImageJ, V.1.42q, National Institutes of Health, USA). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
IrbyDocket: 10-537Issue(s): (1) Whether, in determining whether Congress "disestablished an Indian reservation," pursuant to Solem v. [read post]