Search for: "Sealed Defendant 1 v. USA" Results 61 - 67 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
BIC USA, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 196, 207-208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Consumer Product Safety Commission) (“The CPSC regulations establish general, rudimentary and minimal requirements. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 12:46 pm by John Floyd
Other cases where FISA was used may be sealed. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Ars Technica), Google, GE join forces for green tech research, lobbying: (Ars Technica), AIPPI Congress: how to protect you IP rights in virtual worlds (Managing Intellectual Property), Industry still wary of ICANN plan for new top-level internet domains: (Intellectual Property Watch), Ubuntu-Firefox EULA dustup reignites OSS licensing debate: (Ars Technica), Media standard backers attempt Apple-less solo run: (Out-Law), Open Source in Mobile conference: OpenMoko CEO says embrace fragmentation,… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
Specifically, as was also a problem in interferences, any derivation proceeding must be filed within 1 year. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  This was not a case where the government needed to proceed in secret to safeguard its investigation; the government did not proceed “under seal,” which secretes the motion from public view; and the government presented no extraordinary circumstances as to why Apple should not get the opportunity to oppose the government on the matter. [read post]