Search for: "Searle v. United States of America" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2021, 2:12 am by Radhi Shah (USC Gould School of Law)
28 U.S.C § 1498 (a) (Governmental Use) The United States (U.S.) does not have any provisions for a compulsory license. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Searles Valley Minerals, XL Specialty Insurance, administered by Tristar Risk Management, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]