Search for: "Sears, Roebuck And Co." Results 161 - 180 of 347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2009, 2:43 pm
" The lawsuit names Mid-America Door Co. and Sears, Roebuck & Co. alleging that the door's failures were caused by a defect in the product. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:56 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” (internal quotation marks and citationsomitted)); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
Finally, I also happen to know that in the late 1990s, a woman sued Sears, Roebuck & Co. making allegations similar to those later made by Meckler. [read post]
After Sears, Roebuck & Co. merged with Kmart Corp. in 2005, the board of Sears Holdings Corp. inherited directors from both companies. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 11:16 am by Epstein Becker Green
The California Court of Appeal just affirmed a trial court’s denial of class certification for Sears, Roebuck and Co. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 9:00 am by Tim Zinnecker
He devised the plan that made Sears, Roebuck Co. the first publicly owned retail operation in the world, helped convince Woodrow Wilson to pass the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and became a power player in the world of Wall Street finance at a time when Jews were considered outsiders. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:38 am by Michael J. Fekete
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 24 (1994) (award of attorneys fees required where “plaintiff can prove that defendant committed an unlawful practice, even if the victim cannot show any ascertainable loss and thus cannot recover treble damages. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 8:20 am by Max Mallory
The Court vacated and remanded the lower court’s decision in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 365 Md. 67, 775 A.2d 1218 (2001). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:13 am by Curt Cutting
Sears, Roebuck & Co.) has nothing to do with punitive damages. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:22 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Sears Roebuck & Co. is already famous for the suggestion made by plaintiffs’ counsel in oral argument that the Seventh Circuit panel’s three male judges poll their wives to see if they agreed whether the possibility that a stainless steel clothes dryer contained non-stainless components made them fearful of rust damage to their laundry. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:01 am by Broc Romanek
June 13, 2012) - authored by Judge Easterbrook (joined by Judges Posner and Bauer), the Seventh Circuit reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment for defendants a shareholders' derivative suit alleging that Sears Roebuck & Co. violated Section 8 by having on its Board of Directors two individuals who also served on the boards of Sears competitors. [read post]