Search for: "Sears Holdings Corporation Administrative Committee"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
During the opening decades of the 20th century, it was second only to Sears, Roebuck and Company in net mail-order retail sales. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In an unreported August 1, 2011 ruling in National Credit Union Administration v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Senate and presidential candidates, including Donald Trump in 2016, through shell corporations. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 1:08 am
Sear. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In an unreported August 1, 2011 ruling in National Credit Union Administration v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
P. 26(b)(3)(A); Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1970 Amendment; 8 FED. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 11:17 am
In short Delaware BSA, LLC, is a pure corporate shell. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Exclusive: 5 Senate Banking Dems demand more details on corporate lobbying strategy Yahoo News – Taylor Giorno (The Hill) | Published: 11/15/2023 Five Democrats who sit on the Senate Banking Committee urged the Securities and Exchange Commission to require companies to disclose more details on their corporate lobbying strategy to shareholders. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND L & R ENERGY CORPORATION v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Quebecor World (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
” He refused to adopt the name, and attempts to hold on to his African identity. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
That trend will continue, as a new administration and Democratic Congress enact laws–such as the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act–that expand or create new legal remedies, and cut back on or repeal federal statutes and administrative regulations that have in the past preempted state-law based suits. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down Under) Design… [read post]
