Search for: "Sears Roebuck & Company"
Results 81 - 100
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 5:13 am
Sears Roebuck & Co. case (which resulted in a $6.2 million settlement), offered the following five observations on the EEOC’s view of these policies: An inflexible period of disability leave, even if substantial, is not sufficient to satisfy an employer’s duty of reasonable accommodation. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:50 am
The EEOC in 2009 settled a landmark case against Sears Roebuck & Co. for a record $6.2 million, alleging that the company’s leave policy violated the ADA. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:39 am
Sears, Roebuck & Company, 792 N.E.2d 145 (Mass. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:15 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 252 N.J. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:38 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 24 (1994) (award of attorneys fees required where “plaintiff can prove that defendant committed an unlawful practice, even if the victim cannot show any ascertainable loss and thus cannot recover treble damages. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 5:29 am
Sears, Roebuck & Company (7th Cir. 11/2/10) [pdf] involves the attempted litigation of multiple class action lawsuits in different states over the issue of whether the advertising of a stainless steel dryer drum was deceptive. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:18 am
Sears, Roebuck and Company (No. 10-2407). [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Sears, Roebuck and Co. ( October 14, 2010) ___Cal.App.4th___ (Second App. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:48 am
Initially, the major investor and the major advertiser on the site was Sears Roebuck. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:57 pm
Social Media Policies Download the PowerPoint: ALM Social Media Policies FTC Action against Ann Taylor FTC Action Against Reverb SEC Guidance on the Use of Company Websites Organized Labor and Social Media Policies Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board in Sears Holdings (Roebucks) Case 18-CA-19081 Basic policy: Be professional, kind, discreet, authentic. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Sears had a policy that prohibited “disparagement of company’s or competitors’ products, services, executive leadership, employees, strategy, and business prospects. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:12 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 21 (1994)). [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:44 am
The UAC cited several opinions for this proposition, such as the case of Sears & Roebuck v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
He is the former Chairman, President, and CEO of Sears, Roebuck, and Co., serving from 1995 to 2000. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:07 am
Sears Roebuck, 138 N.J. 2, 24 (1994). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2 (1994), stating: In 1960, the Legislature passed the Consumer Fraud Act “to permit the Attorney General to combat the increasingly widespread practice of defrauding the consumer. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:15 pm
It encompasses the original farm built in 1918 by Albert Loeb, President of Sears, Roebuck, and Company. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:50 pm
Dutch companies as both producers and users: Many more product innovations (made in the role of producer) are protected with IP (45% v.s. 11%); 85% of process innovations (made in the role of user) voluntarily help with copying/transfer of knowledge, because what they want is the product, compared to 17% of producer/product innovations. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:24 am
Sears, Roebuck and Company, 2010 WL 918068 (Ky.App.) [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Sears, Roebuck and Company, __ F. 3d __, 2010 WL 476653 (7th Cir. [read post]
