Search for: "Sellers v. Jacobs" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Jacobs, concurring, says only contemporary commercial exploitation is before the court. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by Unknown
” The court determined that Jacobs does not apply in this case.In Jacobs, the court stated, the defendant was an out-of-state agent acting on behalf of Oregon residents who were the sellers of the investment. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 8:30 am by Camilla Hrdy
It was not just to prevent other sellers from using similar names (e.g. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 1:06 am by CMS
In this post, Jacob Gilkes, a member of the tax team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Balhousie Holdings Limited v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs, which concerns whether a sale and leaseback transaction should be regarded for VAT purposes as a disposal by the seller of its “entire interest” in the building. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:39 am by Kevin LaCroix
The buyer subsequently alleged that the seller had misrepresented its fee structure. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 3:18 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
 In Jacobs v Cartalemi, the Court held that the “right to an accounting is premised upon the existence of a confidential or fiduciary relationship and a breach of the duty imposed by that relationship respecting property in which the party seeking the accounting has an interest. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:45 am
  So over to J.D candidate (Class of 2019), Jacob Tesch, for the first report from the conference on the Music Licensing session: "During Thursday afternoon’s session Music Licensing, Termination & Territoriality: Time for Recalibration? [read post]