Search for: "Sellers v. USA"
Results 1 - 20
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 11:34 am
Baum v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:05 am
The district court concluded that Amazon was not liable for promotional advertising emails that used the seller’s trademark because it did not imply a false association between Amazon and the seller. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 12:25 pm
Oral Argument in case: ; USA v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 12:25 pm
Oral Argument in case# 09-2516; USA v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:13 pm
Supreme Court's opinion in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:11 am
See Inman v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:26 am
curid=4112199 A recent case out of Michigan, Naturipe Foods, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:20 pm
€ 190 The post USA: Prospectus Technology LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 8:12 am
Full disclosure of the identity of the restorer and the used nature of the product protects a seller of second-hand goods from liability for a trademark infringement claim. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 12:27 pm
One such case is Kabbalah Jeans, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:43 pm
Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:12 am
Not only did appellee’s arguments have virtually no likelihood of success because the seller had waived them, but its actions in bringing the appeal were found to be a tactic to draw out the proceedings as long as possible while knowing that it had no viable substantive defense (Quincy Bioscience, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 2:14 pm
In Beltronics USA, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:03 am
” Of course, this foreign anaphora omits a key domestic conclusion: the harm was directed to the USA and felt in the USA by the TM owner. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
Accord Wheat v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:44 am
Kelly v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 4:53 pm
SSP Partners v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 1:59 am
Aufgepasst; völliger Haftungsausschluss bei Vertragsbruch auch in den USA nicht zulässig; hier sogar mit enormem Strafschadensersatz belegt (dieser wird eventuell in zweiter Instanz reduziert): Sixth Circuit Affirms $33M Jury Verdict in Breach of Contract Case (Whitesell Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 12:39 pm
” Gomez v. [read post]
