Search for: "Series 2004-3" Results 141 - 160 of 1,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2012, 3:27 pm by ambrose
Editor’s note: This is the first in a 2-part series on issues of content permanence. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:36 pm
(Another of IntLawGrrls' several posts on the Charles Taylor judgment, part of our Sierra Leone accountability series) Comments minimizing conviction for aiding and abetting deserve a double-take. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
” The series was indeed subsequently published, and indeed became commercially valuable. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 6:28 am
Series E+ financings recorded greatest gains in valuation results Series E+ financings recording the greatest gains in average and median price increases compared to the prior quarter. [read post]
8 Feb 2006, 10:05 am
Here's a series of recent papers on the design and reception of legal institutions in Asia; increasingly a major and absolutely fascinating area for comparative research. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 10:57 pm by Tessa Shepperson
The HMO Legal Basics series is a collaboration between Tessa Shepperson and David Smith of Anthony Gold Solicitors. [read post]
27 May 2010, 5:00 am by Daniel Snare
Introduction Part one of the blog’s BRIC Project’s China Series seeks to illuminate the regulatory structures, agencies, and institutions that make up corporate governance (gongsi zhili) in China. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:48 pm
We’re huge fans of his cancelled TV series “Freaks and Geeks. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 7:46 am
The Court held that retaliation claims based on a series of related acts constitute a continuing violation if they meet the following requirements: (1) the acts are sufficiently similar in kind; (2) have occurred with reasonable frequency; and (3) have not acquired a degree of permanence. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:05 am
Extending a promotion eligible list following wrongful disqualificationMatter of Carozza v City of New York, 37 AD3d 247Brigitte Carozza won her lawsuit contending that she and her co-plaintiffs had been “wrongfully disqualified retroactively from consideration for promotion by reason of having just been placed in new job titles” (see Matter of Carozza v City of New York, 10 AD3d 488 [2004]).* As a result, Carozza and her co-plaintiffs were placed on promotion eligible lists… [read post]