Search for: "Severance v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 41 - 60 of 400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2012, 7:21 pm
Commissioner of Social Security, the Court ruled that an ALJ considering a disability benefits claim by a person who suffers from obesity must perform an "individualized inquiry" that "focus[es] on the combined effect of obesity and other severe impairments. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:22 pm
Commissioner of Social Security serves as a reminder to Social Security disability claimants - and their lawyers - that they must be mindful of the statute of limitations in considering whether to appeal a denial of benefits. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:51 pm
Commissioner, Social Security Administration lays out the basic framework under which a Social Security Administration (SSA) Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) is expected to review a Social Security Disability benefits claim. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 6:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
You can receive disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act if you suffer a physical or workplace injury and cannot perform any long-lasting substantial gainful activity. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:10 am
Commissioner of Social Security, the District Court for the District of New Jersey explains that a Social Security judge who relies on testimony from a vocational expert (VE) in deciding a disability benefits case must give the VE sufficient background information regarding the claimant's impairments. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:06 am
Commissioner of Social Security Social Security Disability Benefits for Mental Impairments that Have Not Been Formally Treated - Boulis-Gasche v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 9:28 pm by Sme
Colvin, Acting Commissioner (10th Cir., November 21, 2014) (affirming denial of social security benefits despite severe impairments, as Alarid was not "disabled" within the meaning of the social security act) Torres v. [read post]
by Norma Coe, Kelly Haverstick, Alicia Munnell, and Anthony Webb Severe Impairment in Social Security Disability Cases - Parker-Grose v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:59 am by Kristine Knaplund
Eric Miller, Assistant to the Solicitor General, argued on behalf of Michael Astrue, the Commissioner of Social Security, that when the Social Security Act was enacted without a definition of the word “child” in Section 416(e), Congress intended that every child, even one born during the marriage whose parentage was not in doubt, must demonstrate that she qualifies as a child under state law. [read post]
  The change in administration paves the way for a Democratic-led Commission, though a permanent FTC Chairman and a successor to Commissioner Chopra (who has been nominated to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) might not be confirmed for several months. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:44 pm by Sme
Berryhill (10th Cir., July 10, 2017) (affirming denial of social security benefits because, while Scott suffered from severe impairments, she retained the residual capacity to perform light work) *Olson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Comm Social Security    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids SOCIAL SECURITY: COOK, Circuit Judge. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Cruse ("Cruse") challenges the district court's decision affirming the determination of the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") that Cruse was not disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance and supplemental security income ("SSI") benefits under the Social Security Act (the "Act"). [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
National Blog Social Media for Law FirmsThe Best Social Media Tools for Lawyers in 2015 Each and every person manage several tasks at once (business and personal), and usually with great difficulty. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 7:30 am by Kathryn Moore
Section 405(g) provides in relevant part: Any individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Commissioner of Social Security may allow. [read post]