Search for: "Shaub"
Results 61 - 80
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2020, 12:19 pm
To bring us up to speed with where we are, where we are after the big John Bolton bombshell over the weekend, and the coming fight over witnesses, Benjamin Wittes spoke with Margaret Taylor, Quinta Jurecic, and Jonathan David Shaub. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 8:33 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jonathan Shaub argued that the Senate should not justify ignoring John Bolton on the grounds that it needs to protect executive privilege. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 10:38 am
Jonathan Shaub examined the process to subpoena witnesses in the Senate impeachment trial. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:03 am
Jen Patja Howell shared a new episode of The Lawfare Podcast, which features David Priess, Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub, Margaret Taylor and Benjamin Wittes imagining what the Senate impeachment trial will look like. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:58 pm
Benjamin Wittes gathered in the Jungle Studio with Margaret Taylor, Molly Reynolds, David Priess, and Jonathan Shaub (by phone) to imagine what that trial will look like. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:41 am
” Jonathan Shaub looked at the law underlying the executive branch’s refusal to comply with the House’s impeachment inquiry. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
” Jonathan Shaub considered the legal basis for the withholding of testimony by some in the impeachment trial. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 2:50 pm
But in recent statements, Walter Shaub, former director of the US Office of Government Ethics and this year's recipient of the Paul Douglas Award... [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:21 am
Jonathan Shaub proposed an understanding of executive privilege that, he argues, aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles than does much contemporary discussion of the subject. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:43 am
Jonathan Shaub proposed a less expansive understanding of executive privilege that aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am
Lawfare contributor Jonathan Shaub has written extensively, here, here and here, on how prior administrations have framed and applied the theory of testimonial immunity. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:19 am
Jonathan Shaub noted that the ongoing litigation over Don McGahn’s testimony revolves around a little-noticed question: whether the president has the authority to direct a private individual not to comply with the committee’s subpoena. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am
Jonathan Shaub delved into the Trump administration's new interpretation of executive privilege. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am
Jonathan Shaub walked readers through that assertion. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:19 pm
The last few days have seen a whiplash-worthy series of actions between Congress and the executive branch, with battles over subpoenas, threats of contempt and even cries of constitutional crisis. [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:48 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jonathan Shaub unpacked the meaning of President Trump’s “protective” assertion of executive privilege over the unredacted Mueller report. [read post]
4 May 2019, 6:03 am
Shaub also dove into the issue of whether former White House counsel Don McGahn will testify before Congress about the Mueller report. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:05 pm
Jonathan Shaub argued that the constitutional explanations provided by the Trump administration for not complying with Congress's subpoenas are neither novel nor uncharacteristic of the legislative-executive relationship. [read post]
