Search for: "Shaub"
Results 81 - 100
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2022, 9:22 am
Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jurecic sat down with Jonathan David Shaub and Mike Stern to discuss the Jan. 6 contempt of Congress cases: Howell also shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which McBrien sat down with Daniel Bessner to discuss the debate between the restrainers and the liberal internationalists over the future of U.S. foreign policy: David Priess shared an episode of Chatter in which he sat down with Sarah Churchwell to discuss Gone with the… [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am
Rohini Kurup and Jonathan Shaub discussed a recent Justice Department filing about testimonial immunity of presidential advisers, which they argue offers clues about why Peter Navarro faces prosecution for contempt of Congress while Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino do not. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:55 am
One House Administration Committee aide argues that Shaub’s criticism mischaracterizes the qualified blind trust provision. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
“The problem is the direct assault on the ethics program which is the thing that every person in that room had committed their lives to,” Shaub said. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
Shaub has questioned Donald Trump’s commitment to confront his potential conflicts-of-interest. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:17 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write that where the appellant or moving party is the State or any officer or agency of the State or of any political subdivision of the State '[s]ervice upon the adverse party of a notice of appeal or an affidavit of intention to move for permission to appeal stays all proceedings to enforce the judgment or order appealed from pending the appeal or determination on the motion for permission to appeal.' "
… [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:15 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write: Although every unsuccessful litigant would like a second chance to present its case from the start - the "do-over" concept from the playground - this will not occur in the context of an appeal from an adverse jury verdict. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:31 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write: When an appellate court reverses a judgment and grants a new trial, it is not unusual for the losing party to want to salvage something from the original trial, such as a favorable (and unexpected) jury determination on a difficult issue that is not likely to be repeated by a second jury. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:16 am
., for October Term 2012 at the Supreme Court), with law schools and prior clerkships noted parenthetically: Brinton Lucas (UVA / Wilkinson) Daniel Taylor (Georgetown / Thapar / Sutton) Julia Malkina (Yale / Kavanaugh) Jonathan Shaub (Northwestern / Niemeyer) Not surprisingly, all four fellows graduated from top law schools and clerked for prominent feeder judges. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:48 am
Former Obama-era ethics official Walter Shaub called the art sale a “terrible idea” and noted that “it just is implausible that this art from an unknown artist would be selling at this price if it didn’t have the Biden name attached to it. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:19 pm
The last few days have seen a whiplash-worthy series of actions between Congress and the executive branch, with battles over subpoenas, threats of contempt and even cries of constitutional crisis. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am
Lawfare contributor Jonathan Shaub has written extensively, here, here and here, on how prior administrations have framed and applied the theory of testimonial immunity. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:42 am
Committee Chairperson Jason Chaffetz called Shaub’s comments “highly unethical” and summoned him to a closed-door meeting. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 8:37 pm
Shaub repeatedly challenged the Trump administration on ethics issues. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:28 am
Shaub called for nearly a dozen legal changes to strengthen the federal ethics system – changes that, in many cases, he had not considered necessary before Trump’s election. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm
Howell also shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast that featured a conversation between Jurecic, Roger Parloff and Jonathan David Shaub about the contempt prosecution of Steve Bannon: Pompilio posted a complaint filed by a group of Wisconsin voters against twelve individuals who allegedly conspired to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
20 May 2021, 12:58 pm
” ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jonathan Shaub argued that the agreement over the testimony of former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a significant loss for Congress and an affirmation of a strikingly broad view of executive privilege. [read post]
