Search for: "Shaub"
Results 121 - 136
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2010, 7:23 am
Shaub of Los Angeles-based Shaub & Williams LLP, will no doubt see to that. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:44 am
One wonders why, though, Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt ever took on this case (i.e., one with minimal injuries and little prospect of proving fault on the defendants' part). [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:04 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write: In discretionary matters, the Appellate Division's scope of review is co-extensive with that of the trial court, and it may exercise its discretion independently. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 4:51 pm
I participated in the Basic Training/Bootcamp Track for newly admitted lawyers, and was fortunate enough to follow Joseph Shaub, a terrific speaker. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:33 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, discuss the rules governing the certification of questions of state law to the New York Court of Appeals from certain federal courts and other courts of last resort, an exception to the time-honored rule that the courts of New York do not issue advisory opinions. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:48 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write: It is better to let someone else contribute to the body of case law governing the timeliness of appeals; receiving a motion to dismiss your appeal for untimeliness will probably result in many sleepless nights. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:17 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write that where the appellant or moving party is the State or any officer or agency of the State or of any political subdivision of the State '[s]ervice upon the adverse party of a notice of appeal or an affidavit of intention to move for permission to appeal stays all proceedings to enforce the judgment or order appealed from pending the appeal or determination on the motion for permission to appeal.' "
… [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:31 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write: When an appellate court reverses a judgment and grants a new trial, it is not unusual for the losing party to want to salvage something from the original trial, such as a favorable (and unexpected) jury determination on a difficult issue that is not likely to be repeated by a second jury. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:15 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write: Although every unsuccessful litigant would like a second chance to present its case from the start - the "do-over" concept from the playground - this will not occur in the context of an appeal from an adverse jury verdict. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:39 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, review the Second Circuit's decision in In re American Safety Indemnity Co., where the court reaffirmed the rule that '[w]here a judgment is re-entered, and the subsequent judgment does not alter the substantive rights affected by the first judgment, the time for appeal runs from the first judgment.' "
OUTSIDE COUNSEL:
New Basis for Executive Criminal Liability for Tragedies
Wednesday,… [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:18 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write that the writ of mandamus is not a substitute for an appeal and the Second Circuit has expressed its "special reluctance" to grant such a remedy"
Real Estate Securities
Subscription Required
Wednesday, December 5, 2007
By Peter M. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 12:34 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, examine a recent Second Circuit decision which discusses partial final judgments pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:20 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, examine a recent decision where a panel declined to give preclusive effect to a trial-level order in a prior action that was reviewed on appeal, where the reviewing appellate court affirmed on one ground and did not address the other. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:17 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, examine Estevez-Yalcin v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:02 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write that appellate courts do not look kindly on cases involving violations of the basic rule that new facts may not be injected at the appellate level, yet such cases appear in the advance sheets and reporters with surprising regularity.
PerspectiveWednesday, December 6, 2006By Jonathan LippmanJonathan Lippman, a Supreme Court justice and the chief administrative judge of the New York courts, writes: There is a new… [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 4:16 pm
Shaub, doing business under the firm name Mulry & Shaub L.L.P. [read post]
