Search for: "Shields Operating, Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 826
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2022, 12:44 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:17 am
(“SCLI” or “the Company”), which owned a non-public, China-based operating company. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:41 pm
Does an employee’s complaint to a supervisor or other company official regarding alleged wage violations shield that employee from retaliatory discharge under the FLSA? [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:59 am
Eastman Outdoors, Inc., 508 F.3d 1358, 1362 (Fed. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:49 am
Horizon Healthcare, which operates as Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, also agreed to revise its current practices for processing claims when secondary to Medicare. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 12:50 pm
Bloomberg is reporting that Raleigh based, Progress Energy Inc., led the U.S. list for near misses by nuclear power plants. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:22 pm
Management Hospitality of Racine, Inc., et al., No. 10-3247 (Jan. 9, 2012,). [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:35 am
/Smithco Fabricators Inc. and Pavo Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
Riverside Hosp., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 1:04 pm
Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 1:04 pm
Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:30 am
©2014 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
AT&T Operator Sued Under OSHA Filed in the U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
Dispensary operations continued as normal. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
Therefore, the court declined to apply the Server Test, and concluded that the publisher defendants “violated plaintiff’s exclusive display right [and] the fact that the image was hosted on a server owned and operated by an unrelated third party (Twitter) does not shield them from this result. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 4:55 pm
See Aqua Shield v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
Instead, it applies presumptively by operation of law. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 3:22 pm
In order to prevail on a claim under Labor law §200, a plaintiff is required to establish that a defendant exercised some supervisory control over the operation (Mendoza v Cornwall Hill Estates, Inc., 199 AD2d 368, 605 NYS2d 308 [2nd Dept 1993]). [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:12 am
Mgt., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:08 am
Pure Energy Services (USA), Inc. [read post]
