Search for: "Shoe Show, Inc"
Results 21 - 40
of 517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 5:30 am
See Yurman Design, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:13 am
The Shape-up show has become a large source of revenue for the Skechers brand, as the U.S. toning shoe market craze is sweeping the retail market. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:08 pm
Cute shoes, but should she be a paralegal? [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:00 pm
For years, sneaker giant Converse, Inc. has sought to protect its brand by claiming trademark rights in its famous Chuck Taylor sneaker. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:02 am
Samara Bros., Inc., 529 U.S. 205 (2000), the Supreme Court held that a product design (such as a shoe portion) is never inherently distinctive, but that distinctiveness may be acquired and proven with “a showing of secondary meaning” — i.e., that the relevant consumers associate the particular product features with a particular source of goods. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 11:59 am
Travis County Shoe Hosp., Inc., 16-51431, 2018 WL 704131 (5th Cir. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:44 pm
In essence, a proper preliminary showing would shift the usual regulatory burden of proof post-approval. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:28 pm
Washington Shoe Co., 704 F.3d at 672; Int’l Shoe Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:58 am
However, the district court found that the polka dots design was sufficiently original to be protected by copyright, relying on PrinceGroup, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 2:23 pm
GoTo.com, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 10:41 am
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:57 pm
Already, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 6:07 pm
But that was the purpose: to place before respondents the language “Red Wing Shoe Company, Inc. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:17 am
’” International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 11:02 am
A soon-to-be-released study by the American Bar Association shows that the number of legal malpractice suits lodged against "white shoe" firms has risen dramatically since 1996. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
It is already established that the red sole mark is indeed distinctive, and the acceptance of the mark’s distinctiveness shows what acquired, in contrast to inherent distinctiveness, can encompass. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 8:14 am
Here is the problem — the patent includes claim features on the bottom-side of the shoe, and Fig 11 does not show the bottom of the shoe. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 1:14 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was recently tasked with reviewing determinations made by the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) relating to trade infringement claims brought by Converse, Inc. with regard to a number of imported shoes that it alleged infringed on one of its trademarks. [read post]
