Search for: "Short v. City of Birmingham"
Results 21 - 40
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
Some of the back history of this case was in R (Kelly, Mehari and JI) v Birmingham City Council [2009] EWHC 3240 (Admin) (our note) and R (Khazai, Ebrahim, Azizi and Mirghani) v Birmingham City Council [2010] EWHC 2576 (Admin) (our note), in both of which Birmingham faced substantial criticism of their homeless procedures and gatekeeping. [read post]
19 May 2012, 1:36 pm
Birmingham City Council, Trengrove v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm
Birmingham City Council v Balog [2013] EWCA Civ 1582A s.202 review decision on affordability was at the centre of this second appeal, brought by Birmingham after a s.204 appeal decision went against them. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm
Birmingham City Council v Balog [2013] EWCA Civ 1582A s.202 review decision on affordability was at the centre of this second appeal, brought by Birmingham after a s.204 appeal decision went against them. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:06 pm
R (Elkundi) v Birmingham and R (Imam) v Croydon (2022) EWCA Civ 601 (not on Bailii yet. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm
Birmingham City Council v Wilson [2016] EWCA Civ 1137 In Pieretti v Enfield LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 1104 (our note) the Court of Appeal held that under (the predecessor to) the Equality Act, in the course of Housing Act 1997 Part VII inquiries, a reviewing officer was required to carry out inquiries into an applicant’s disability that the Housing Act 1996 had not previously required, i.e. where the applicant had not raised the issue but… [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 12:20 pm
(Aweys and Others) v Birmingham City Council. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
See Timbs v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court granted cert in Timbs v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
Collins that the court papers for Masses Publishing Co. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
City of East St. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
She referred to the Birmingham schoolgirl case, R v Birmingham City Council Ex p Equal Opportunities Commission [1989] 1 AC 1155, where a system of selection for secondary school places existed but for historical reasons it had fewer places for girls than boys. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
” Comtel Air passengers on a Tuesday flight to Birmingham, England, from the Indian city of Amritsar were hit up for 130 pounds — about $200 each — during a layover in Vienna. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
The principles would also apply to all pre-decision accommodation or pending review or appeal, as it must also be suitable under Housing Act 1996 s.205 and s.206(1)As David notes, Lady Hale’s comments in Birmingham City Council v Ali; Moran v Manchester City Council [2009] UKHL 36 (our note here) to the effect that that accommodation which may be unreasonable for a person to occupy for a long period may be reasonable for him to occupy… [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
The principles would also apply to all pre-decision accommodation or pending review or appeal, as it must also be suitable under Housing Act 1996 s.205 and s.206(1)As David notes, Lady Hale’s comments in Birmingham City Council v Ali; Moran v Manchester City Council [2009] UKHL 36 (our note here) to the effect that that accommodation which may be unreasonable for a person to occupy for a long period may be reasonable for him to occupy… [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm
Ali v Birmingham CC (our report here) had held that a s.204 appeal was not a determination of a civil right, such that article 6(1) ECHR. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
On second appeal, Solihull argued that to accept Ms K’s argument was to undermine the Court of Appeal decision in Akhtar v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 383 [Our report]. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
On second appeal, Solihull argued that to accept Ms K’s argument was to undermine the Court of Appeal decision in Akhtar v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 383 [Our report]. [read post]
