Search for: "Short v. City of Birmingham"
Results 21 - 40
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
See Timbs v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:33 am
The High Court held: Any decision on ‘good reason’ was not influenced by the merits of the appeal – Short v Birmingham City Council (2005) EWHC 2112. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:07 am
On the contrary, the Germans started employing new weapons of indiscriminate killing—V-1 and V-2 rockets. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:32 am
Following Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire District Council (2005) HLR 1, the Circuit Judge found that it was. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:05 am
” [John Kenneth Ross, Short Circuit, on Lewis v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
She referred to the Birmingham schoolgirl case, R v Birmingham City Council Ex p Equal Opportunities Commission [1989] 1 AC 1155, where a system of selection for secondary school places existed but for historical reasons it had fewer places for girls than boys. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court granted cert in Timbs v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Chief Justice Strine dissented, excoriating Duke for its "business strategy … to run the company in a manner that purposely skirted, and in many ways consciously violated, important environmental laws" (City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
Collins that the court papers for Masses Publishing Co. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
This is going to be a very short post on a very long judgment – 275 paragraphs worth. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:43 am
The quickest to file are the EEOC district offices in Kansas City, Little Rock, Oklahoma City, and Los Angeles. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm
Ali v Birmingham CC (our report here) had held that a s.204 appeal was not a determination of a civil right, such that article 6(1) ECHR. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm
Birmingham City Council v Wilson [2016] EWCA Civ 1137 In Pieretti v Enfield LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 1104 (our note) the Court of Appeal held that under (the predecessor to) the Equality Act, in the course of Housing Act 1997 Part VII inquiries, a reviewing officer was required to carry out inquiries into an applicant’s disability that the Housing Act 1996 had not previously required, i.e. where the applicant had not raised the issue but… [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:02 am
Its deficiencies were acknowledged in the Court of Appeal’s decision in Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 629; [2013] PTSR 117, para 46. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
Some of the back history of this case was in R (Kelly, Mehari and JI) v Birmingham City Council [2009] EWHC 3240 (Admin) (our note) and R (Khazai, Ebrahim, Azizi and Mirghani) v Birmingham City Council [2010] EWHC 2576 (Admin) (our note), in both of which Birmingham faced substantial criticism of their homeless procedures and gatekeeping. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:32 pm
As CLP put it: It appears that Birmingham City Council implemented a system of using High Court bailiffs without getting proper legal advice. [read post]
20 May 2015, 11:49 am
In fact, he said he believes the city has never experienced so many incidents of violent crime in such a short amount of time. [read post]
20 May 2015, 11:49 am
In fact, he said he believes the city has never experienced so many incidents of violent crime in such a short amount of time. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Shelton v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
