Search for: "Simon v. Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
The Permanent Mission of India to the United NationsDocket: 10-627Issue(s): 1) Whether, in determining whether Congress authorized the Secretary of State ("Secretary") to preempt traditional state taxing powers by designating certain exemptions from state and local property tax laws under The Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
This was summarised during questions to the Home Office minister in the House of Lords in 2003:Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked her Majesty's Government: Whether denying prisoners the right to vote affects their ability to persuade Ministers of the Crown and those responsible for the Prison Service to improve the conditions in which they are imprisoned; and whether denying prisoners the right to vote amounts to an additional punishment; and whether this is compatible with Article 25 of… [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Sebelius Court: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 09-2281 September 19, 2011 Judge: Seymour Areas of Law: Contracts, Government & Administrative Law, Native American Law This was the second appeal in litigation arising from the Secretary of Health and Human Services' (HHS) decision not to enter into a self-determination contract with the Southern Ute Indian Tribe (Tribe). [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke apparently made phone calls to Alaska’s two Senators threatening adverse departmental actions toward their state if Murkowski did not get behind the health care repeal effort. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke apparently made phone calls to Alaska’s two Senators threatening adverse departmental actions toward their state if Murkowski did not get behind the health care repeal effort. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
Simon Carne questions why the Mail wants its day in court here. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
