Search for: "Simply Fashion Stores, Ltd."
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
The fact that a disputant in a fashion IP dispute has an exit strategy for bailing out of litigation etc is a reality, and even if you don't say what your client's exit strategy is, it isn't dificult to guess if you simply put yourself in the shoes of the other side. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 7:34 am
Physical separability simply means that the artistic design of the object can be physically separated from the functional one-a rare case for fashion designs. [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:46 am
in Twigland Fashions, Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:28 pm
However, some stores are managing to buck the trend. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 2:20 pm
This is what the ECJ sought to answer.The case that faced this question was Karen Millen Fashions Ltd v Dunnes Stores, decided in the Summer of last year. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 9:17 pm
Amdocs, Ltd., at *2-3. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
He found that Rihanna and her associated companies had acquired significant goodwill in relation to fashion clothing – in the fashion world she was seen as a ‘style leader’. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:48 am
The judge therefore found that BCPL did not infringe Ashley Wilde's copyright.CommentIn a way, this case concerns simply the good old-fashioned idea/expression dichotomy. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm
The fashion houses were using copyright to try to limit and control public dissemination of images of the shows. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:52 pm
That case involved back-mounted packs that had one compartment for storing personal effects and a separate insulated compartment for storing liquid and delivering the liquid to the user in a “hands-free” fashion. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
” Furthermore, the Board expressly overruled its prior ruling in Research in Motion Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:24 pm
” Furthermore, the Board expressly overruled its prior ruling in Research in Motion Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
Ltd., the Court took a tough stance toward the defendants. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
In City Chain Stores (S) Pte, Ltd. vs Louis Vuitton Malletier, the Court of Appeal of Singapore overturned the trial court which enjoined City Chain Stores of using Louis Vuitton's flower quatrefoil, and flower quatrefoil diamond designs, because it deemed that City Chain Stores used the designs in a random pattern and non-uniform way and therefore not in a origin-related use but for embellishment and decorative purposes. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
”, and the answer is best understood if you put your mind into the world of high fashion where things do not always have the same meaning that us logic [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
Likewise, say Robinsons-May (the boycotted business in Fashion Valley Mall, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 10:30 am
” * RVC Floor Decor, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
Our Canadian labour and employment system in Ontario functions under Collective Bargaining, Common Law, and Employment Standards Act (ESA) regimes. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
Trust Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
Aldi make-up lookalike infringes copyright Islestarr Holdings Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd [2019] EWHC 1473 (June 2019) A first for Retromark: a case not about trade marks. [read post]
