Search for: "Smith & Nephew, PLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am
In the present case (T 1517/17, consolidated with T 2719/19), the patent proprietor filed an appeal to the interlocutory decision of the opposition division revoking its patent. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
Smith & Nephew affects litigants and attorneys filing challenges at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.(...)Arthrex “threatens to inject an enormous amount of uncertainty into the patent system,” U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:21 am
Smith & Nephew PLC, March 1, 2018, U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:21 am
Smith & Nephew PLC, March 1, 2018, U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
The Court of Appeal reiterated the approach to construction of numerical features and ranges in patent claims as set out in paragraph 38 of Smith & Nephew plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 607. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Full disclosure: David is a Reed Smith case, so this entry is also non-RS.Sergeants Benevolent Ass’n Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:49 am
| Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
| Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:45 am
| Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
.* Smith & Nephew seek to go to the Supreme Court and EPO proceedings continue - the war is not overAfter many posts on Smith & Nephew v Convatec (Court of Appeal judgment here, here, and here; first instance judgment of Mr Justice Birss here), Neil covers the last episodes of the series, both in the UK and in Eponia.* Best thing since sliced bread -- or even better? [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH | CJEU on disclosure of infringers’ bank data in Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg | Infocit - Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda v OHIM | Moral ambiguity of trade secrets | CJEU on limits of TM exclusive right in TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd | Non-traditional trade marks in Japan.Never… [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 54 [week ending on Sunday 5 July] - Google v Oracle and Microsoft/Kyocera settlement | GC and Nagoya | Life Science IP Summit 2015 | (Kat)onomics of patents | Case T-15/13 Group Nivelles v OHIM | Case T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v OHIM v Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Multi Time… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
Once again this is a factor which undermines Smith & Nephew's favoured interpretation of the claim. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 52 [week ending on Sunday 14 June] - EU TM reform | Motivate Publishing FZ LLC and another v Hello Ltd | EPO’s Inventor of the Year: poll results | New network for new IP people | Delfi v Estonia | UPC fees | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , then allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
Convatec counterclaimed that Smith & Nephew’s Durafiber product would infringe the patent. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
In "The wounded patent survived, was only just infringed, but no injunction", here, fellow Kat Darren wrote about the decision of Birss J in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc [2013] EWHC 3955 (Pat), a technically detailed case which amused Merpel, who commented that a case that started off being basically about chemistry ended up being basically about mathematics. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:01 am
Smith & Nephew, PLC, 2015 U.S. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:23 am
. - Smith & Nephew PLC - FMC Corp. - Royal Dutch Shell - Eltek LTD - Hill-Rom Holdings SCOTUS: Awaiting the Halliburton v. [read post]
