Search for: "Smith v. Hale"
Results 81 - 100
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Summers v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Smith, 996 S.W.2d 518, 521 (Mo.App. 1999). [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
In short, we’ll learn whether the Supremes have granted cert in Smith v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:02 am
The assembled panel of experts will include: David Brynmor Thomas, Herbert Smith LLP Dr Stavros Brekoulakis, Queen Mary, University of London Ali Malek QC, 3 Verulam Buildings Duncan Speller, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP Registration and other details of the seminar are available here. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
Particular highlights include: Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE QC, our keynote speaker, who has given a number of significant judgments on housing law cases in the last few years, including Austin v LB Southwark (tolerated trespass); Ali v Birmingham CC (Article 6 and homelessness); Rodriguez v Government of Gibraltar (discrimination in the allocation of housing); Meier v Secretary of State (scope of possession orders); and Pinnock v Manchester. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
Particular highlights include: Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE QC, our keynote speaker, who has given a number of significant judgments on housing law cases in the last few years, including Austin v LB Southwark (tolerated trespass); Ali v Birmingham CC (Article 6 and homelessness); Rodriguez v Government of Gibraltar (discrimination in the allocation of housing); Meier v Secretary of State (scope of possession orders); and Pinnock v Manchester. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Someone will go seriously old skool and play Cumming v Danson or Say v Smith, the quiet one in the corner will drone on about how everyone else always forgets AG Securities, there is always an argument about Bruton, but (and if there is a point to this introduction, this is it) there is now a new giant on the scene, one judgment to rule them all and in its 9 strong constitution bind them - the Supreme Court decision in Pinnock (you might like to check out our note on the… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Someone will go seriously old skool and play Cumming v Danson or Say v Smith, the quiet one in the corner will drone on about how everyone else always forgets AG Securities, there is always an argument about Bruton, but (and if there is a point to this introduction, this is it) there is now a new giant on the scene, one judgment to rule them all and in its 9 strong constitution bind them - the Supreme Court decision in Pinnock (you might like to check out our note on the… [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:18 am
The Court of Appeal (Sedley, Smith LLJ) had, in a single judgment of the Court [...] [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:11 am
Ina Shoe Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:49 pm
The National Law Journal features the Smith v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm
Smith, 230 F.3d 300, 305 (7th Cir. 2000). [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
In Lady Hale’s dissenting judgment, she said that “Mrs Smith must wonder why she is in this court. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:54 pm
Smith v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:26 pm
Specifically, we are happy to report about a fine example of a federal court applying common sense, in Hale v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 11:22 pm
Marshall v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
