Search for: "Smith v. Res-Care, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
In re G.J.D., 2010-Ohio-2677 (11th Dist.) [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 10:18 am
" Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Evidently, the intellectual property bar cares a great deal about whether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, an inventor’s sale of an invention to a third party who is obligated to keep the invention confidential qualifies as prior art for purposes of determining the patentability of the invention. [read post]
18 May 2018, 4:37 am
§ 103 (2006).1 Praxair Distrib., Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:24 am
Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
Cathedral Buffet, Inc., April 16, 2018, Siler, E. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm
"We're going to sue. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 6:09 am
Miller (University of Iowa College of Law), on Monday, February 26, 2018 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Buyouts, Delaware law, DGCL Section 102, Director liability, Duty of care, Fiduciary duties, In re Revlon, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Smith v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
Fox v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
So they're willing to say that it was worth multimillion [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:25 am
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 259 F.3d 154, 164 (3d Cir. 2001) (class certification “places inordinate or hydraulic pressure on defendants to settle”); In re Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc., 51 F.3d 293, 299 (7th Cir. 1995) (class certification may require defendants to “stake their companies on the outcome of a single jury trial”). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
Here, for instance, is a letter that led the court in Correctional Medical Care, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
(CBS, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 8:25 am
Smith v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
PruittHealth, Inc., S16A0655 (Ga. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
In these circumstances and absent an error of principle, an appellate court will be very cautious in differing from the judge's evaluation: see SmithKline Beecham's Patent [2006] RPC 323 at [38] per Lord Hoffmann; Halliburton Energy Services Inc v Smith International (North Sea) Ltd and anor [2006] EWCA Civ 1715 at [24] to [25] per Jacob LJ" 3. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 6:19 am
============================================================ Granted Relists Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
NuVasive, Inc., No. 15-85 (Commil re-hash – mens rea requirement for inducement) 3. [read post]
