Search for: "Smith v. Rose"
Results 1 - 20
of 298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
July 19, 2007) (concluding that the "defendants' description of [the plaintiff] as a racist" was, as a matter of law, "an opinion and thus is not actionable"); Smith v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Bessie Smith’s recording of “Down Hearted Blues” enters the U.S. public domain on January 1, 2024.Effect of the Music Modernization Act on Public Domain for Pre-1972 Sound Recordings The distinction between compositions and recordings is important to remember because these two types of copyrighted works won’t enter the public domain at the same time. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:04 pm
As recognized in a midcentury Supreme Court case about bookstores, Smith v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:34 am
First, to determine whether a partnership formed, courts “must consider whether the parties expressly or implicitly intended to become partners” (Hammond v Smith, 151 AD3d 1896 [4th Dept 2017]). [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
On 11 July 2023, the Court of Appeal heard an appeal over undertakings in the harassment case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there were no allegations about a… [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
Samia v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:24 am
To illustrate, in Shore v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:13 am
Let’s face it, Doe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am
Doe precedents or Doe v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 10:27 am
Making race-based jury selection decisions in violation of Batson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Ben Roberts-Smith will pay defendants’ legal costs in his failed defamation case, ABC reports. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The disgraced former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has called the judgment that found, on the balance of probabilities, he had committed war crimes a “terrible outcome” in his first public comments since the decision. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm
Rose replied that Sir Richard should make them shorter!... [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith, LLP v Law Firm of Howard Mann, 141 AD3d 574 [2d Dept 2016]). [read post]
