Search for: "Smith v. Van Gorkom"
Results 61 - 69
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2008, 11:08 pm
" [17] Van Gorkom The next case is Smith v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 1:18 pm
Van Gorkom, Ribstein replied by suggesting a federal securities case, Basic v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
Their views appear to greatly differ from those of Bebchuk's, who proposes allowing shareholders to alter "rules-of-the-game" decisions or else elect a new team of directors who will.[3] This report will use Bainbridge, Blair and Stout's theories in support of an amendment seeking to expand the rule's exclusions regarding shareholder proposals to limit shareholders' input dealing with elections in general, while Bebchuk's theories will be relied upon to… [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:52 am
Part I of this Article describes the Smith v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:50 am
In constructing this argument, Drury discusses Smith v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 7:07 am
In Smith v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 10:29 pm
Lucky # 13 brings us what might be the most important corporate law decision ever (or, at least, in the time I've been paying attention to it); namely, Smith v Van Gorkom. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:05 am
Van Gorkom. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 10:30 am
The concept of entire fairness, however, has little relevance to a duty of care case like Van Gorkom or Technicolor. [read post]
