Search for: "SmithKline Beecham"
Results 21 - 40
of 438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2012, 10:36 am
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 2012 WL 1057435 (E.D. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Dudas, Docket No. 1:07cv846, as combined with Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:27 am
Smithkline Beecham Corporation. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:32 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. | Cato Institute - JDSupra Cato Institute (amazingly) agrees with the Ninth Circuit that courts... [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 4:11 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 11:37 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., and I cooked up a fresh batch of Lawffice Links just for the occasion: SCOTUS granted cert. back in November 2011, agreeing to analyze the FLSA outside sales exemption as it applies to pharmaceutical sales reps. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:38 pm
USA 1:14-cv-00877; filed July 3, 2014 in the District Court of Delaware • Plaintiffs: GlaxoSmithKline LLC; SmithKline Beecham (Cork) Ltd. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
PRESS RELEASE: GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK) today announced that it has reached agreement with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to join the USPTO’s motion to dismiss its litigation over Final Regulations published in August 2007 (Triantafyllos Tafas and SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham PLC and Glaxo Group Limited vs. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 12:38 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion today in SmithKline Beecham Corporation (GSK) v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:56 pm
Dudas; Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 8:45 pm
Dudas; SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:23 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:23 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:16 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., the Supreme Court ruled on whether pharmaceutical sales representatives are properly classified as exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:53 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 2:15 pm
Dudas; SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 12:48 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., a case which may lead the Court to... [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 2:43 am
SmithKline Beecham yesterday, holding that pharmaceutical representatives are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime provisions as outside salespeople. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
Cacheris of the Eastern District of Virginia has issued his Order, Memorandum and Opinion, and Minute entry for proceedings following today's hearing in the consolidated cases of SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 7:28 am
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 2007 WL 178564 (E.D. [read post]
