Search for: "SmithKline Beecham"
Results 61 - 80
of 438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., dba GlaxoSmithKline, No. 11-204. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:48 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. were pharmaceutical sales representatives. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 2:16 pm
SmithKline Beecham, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, 2:06-cv-03024 (RB) (E.D. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
One such setting is raised by an interesting and important case, Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:01 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., the Supreme Court held that the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) exempts pharmaceutical companies from having to pay overtime wages to sales reps. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:58 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., Dorsey v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:36 pm
John Buse was contacted by SmithKline Beecham in 1999 after noting an increased trend of heart related problems in patients that were taking Avandia. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:41 pm
SmithKline Beecham, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, 04-cv-01748 (DFH/WTL), S.D. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 2:14 pm
Dudas, et al. consolidated with Smithkline Beecham Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:42 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., in which the Court will have to determine whether pharmaceutical sales representatives are subject to the “outside sales” exemption from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime requirements. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
A 7th Circuit court has ruled that a lawsuit may go forward against SmithKline Beecham Corp. over the suicide of a 23-year-old woman who committed suicide after taking the antidepressant Paxil. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 4:45 am
SmithKline Beecham. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm
Smithkline Beecham Corp., dba Glaxosmithkline (June 18, 2012), examined the question of whether pharmaceutical sales representatives, whose primary duty was to obtain nonbinding commitments from physicians to prescribe their employer’s prescription drugs, were correctly classified as exempt from overtime pay requirements set forth in the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:19 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 529 F. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 6:05 am
The Summary Judgment hearing for Tafas/GSK v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 4:06 am
The topic is ‘Smithkline Beecham v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:27 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., a case which may lead the Court to revisit whether an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations merit deference. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:37 am
SmithKline Beecham is here. [read post]
