Search for: "SmithKline Beecham Limited" Results 41 - 60 of 160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
  Ironically, although plaintiffs are quick to harp on the Agency’s limitations, they seem to be more likely than defendants (although both sides do it) to try to exacerbate those limitations by demanding depositions that would distract the FDA’s employees from their regular jobs.The leading FDA case is Giza v. [read post]
In Part One of this series, we began to analyze the recent decision from the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
., in consideration of the “open and obvious” limitation on the duty to warn:[W]hen a warning would have added nothing to the user’s appreciation of the danger, no duty to warn exists as no benefit would be gained by requiring a warning. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 6:25 am by John Day
  Here is link to all of the briefs in the Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 11:43 am by Dennis Crouch
SmithKline Beecham Corp., --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 2456043 (3rd Cir. 2013). [read post]
An antitrust class action lawsuit against Valeant Pharmaceuticals Inc. and SmithKline Beecham Corp., doing business as GlaxoSmithKline and GlaxoSmithKline plc (jointly “GSK”) claimed that these corporations, the ones responsible for the production and marketing of Wellbutrin XL, worked to limit the availability of generic versions of Wellbutrin XL, far less expensive alternatives to the brand-name medication. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
  But we’ll limit ourselves to five – the five theses in Maya that are just plain wrong.Waiver for Preserving Too Many IssuesMaya was another high-stakes SJS/TENS case. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 8:44 am by David Freedman
  Christopher regularly worked 60 hours per week, but received no overtime pay because SmithKline Beecham classified him as an “outside salesman. [read post]