Search for: "SmithKline Beecham Limited"
Results 61 - 80
of 160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2012, 10:04 pm
SmithKline Beecham can be found here. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., which held that pharmaceutical reps are subject to the "outside sales" exemption to the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
SmithKline that pharmaceutical sales reps are exempt from overtime and President Obama shielding—at least temporarily—illegal immigrants brought to the United States as children. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:22 am
SmithKline Beecham of whether these types of employees are exempt under the outside sales exemption. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:31 pm
AND see also SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:15 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
The actual risk has a 95 per cent probability of lying somewhere between upper and lower limits (e.g. 2.2 ±0.3, which equals a risk somewhere between 1.9 and 2.5) (the ‘confidence interval’). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:03 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. – eligibility of “outside salesmen” of pharmaceutical companies for overtime pay Tues., April 17: 11-5683 — Dorsey v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
© Max Kennerly. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
Supposedly, Levine somehow limits Buckman even though not even Levine itself claimed to do that. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. in which the Court will consider whether the Fair Labor Standards Act’s “outside sales exemption” applies to pharmaceutical sales representatives. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., in which the Court will consider whether the “outside sales exemption” of the Fair Labor Standards Act applies to pharmaceutical sales representatives; Jonathan Adler of the Volokh Conspiracy calls it “a case worth watching” for those interested in administrative law. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:42 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., in which the Court will have to determine whether pharmaceutical sales representatives are subject to the “outside sales” exemption from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime requirements. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp.Docket: 11-204Issue(s): (1) Whether deference is owed to the Secretary of Labor's interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act's outside sales exemption and related regulations; and (2) whether the Fair Labor Standards Act's outside sales exemption applies to pharmaceutical sales representatives.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorariAmicus brief of U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:40 am
See SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:30 pm
The scope of reexamination proceedings is limited to "substantial new question[s] of patentability," 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 658 N.W.2d 127 (Mich. 2003)) or the Sixth Circuit (Garcia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:55 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., this decision is particularly disturbing. [read post]
