Search for: "Smithkline Beecham Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2009, 3:18 am
SmithKline Beecham plc and others v Avery and others [2009] EWHC 1488 (QB); [2009] WLR (D) 218 “The word ‘person’ in section 1(1A)(c) Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is not limited to individuals and includes a body corporate, so a company may apply for an injunction under section 3A on grounds of unlawful harassment of its [...] [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:19 pm
This dispute between Smithkline Beecham Corporation and Abbott Laboratories stems from a licensing disagreement and the pricing of HIV medications. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:27 am
Smithkline Beecham Corporation. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 12:38 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion today in SmithKline Beecham Corporation (GSK) v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:23 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:23 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Dudas, Docket No. 1:07cv846, as combined with Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Today in Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
PRESS RELEASE: GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK) today announced that it has reached agreement with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to join the USPTO’s motion to dismiss its litigation over Final Regulations published in August 2007 (Triantafyllos Tafas and SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham PLC and Glaxo Group Limited vs. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:36 am
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 2012 WL 1057435 (E.D. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 12:42 pm
The case involving the removal of a juror because of his sexual orientation (Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:07 am
Cir. 2009, 08-1352) Triantafyllos Tafas, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, and Glaxo Group Limited (collectively “Appellees”) originally filed suit against the USPTO in relation to Final Rules published by the USPTO that placed [...] [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 11:43 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 2456043 (3rd Cir. 2013). [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 2:14 pm
Dudas, et al. consolidated with Smithkline Beecham Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
Factual Background Defendant, SmithKline Beecham Corporation (“SmithKline”) is a pharmaceutical company that develops, manufactures, and sells prescription drugs. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:10 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:54 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, 2013 U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, Civil No. 07-3483 (D. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 6:42 am
This time, the plaintiff is pharmaceutical giant SmithKline Beecham Corporation (d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline). [read post]