Search for: "Smithkline Beecham Corporation"
Results 61 - 80
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2009, 1:04 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 2008 WL 2491965, at *7 (S.D. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 2008 WL 2491965, at *7 (S.D. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:18 am
SmithKline Beecham plc and others v Avery and others [2009] EWHC 1488 (QB); [2009] WLR (D) 218 “The word ‘person’ in section 1(1A)(c) Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is not limited to individuals and includes a body corporate, so a company may apply for an injunction under section 3A on grounds of unlawful harassment of its [...] [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:07 am
Cir. 2009, 08-1352) Triantafyllos Tafas, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, and Glaxo Group Limited (collectively “Appellees”) originally filed suit against the USPTO in relation to Final Rules published by the USPTO that placed [...] [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
14 May 2008, 5:20 am
Antitrust Class Action by Assignees of Direct Purchasers of Antidepressant Wellbutrin SR Satisfied Rule 23 Class Action Requirements Pennsylvania Federal Court Holds Plaintiffs filed a class action complaint against SmithKline Beecham Corporation dba GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) alleging antitrust violations arising out of its manufacture and sale of the antidepressant drug Wellbutrin SR. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Dudas, Docket No. 1:07cv846, as combined with Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:27 am
He was joined by SmithKline Beecham Corporation (d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline). [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) from putting its new claims and continuation rules into effect (SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:23 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:23 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, Civil No. 07-3483 (D. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:00 pm
Dudas, et al. consolidated with Smithkline Beecham Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 2007 WL 2726259 (S.D. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 6:29 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corporation (doing business as GlaxoSmithKline (“GSK”)), stepped up and sued the PTO, seeking both a preliminary injunction and a permanent injunction to prevent the new rules from going into effect. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 2:14 pm
Dudas, et al. consolidated with Smithkline Beecham Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:25 pm
In a lawsuit against the USPTO, SmithKline Beecham Corporation (d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline) filed suit in the United Stated Federal District Court asking the court to preliminarily and permanently enjoin the PTO from implementing the Final Rules contending that the Final Rules are vague, arbitrary and capricious, and prevent GSK (not to mention everyone else) from fully prosecuting patent applications and obtaining patents on one or more of its inventions. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 6:42 am
This time, the plaintiff is pharmaceutical giant SmithKline Beecham Corporation (d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline). [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:32 pm
According to the fifty-two page, eight-count complaint signed by Sherry Knowles, Global Head of Corporate Intellectual Property for SmithKline Beecham,3. [read post]
