Search for: "Solid Property, Inc. " Results 81 - 100 of 342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2020, 5:55 am by Jon L. Gelman
The nine counts against Solvay and Arkema include alleged violations of New Jersey’s Spill Act, Water Pollution Control Act, Air Pollution Control Act, Solid Waste Management Act and Site Remediation Reform Act, as well as creating a public nuisance, trespass, negligence and engaging in abnormally dangerous activity. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 7:01 am
At Debevoise, he supervises the firm's Intellectual Property Litigation Group. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 4:38 pm
In addition to all the legal issues associated with startup, new business owners will eventually have to tackle marketing, product delivery, and intellectual property rights to transform what may be a solid concept into a viable and profitable business. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:49 am by Scott Riddle
State Bank and Trust Company (In re Solid Rock Development Corp., Inc.), Ch. 7 Case No. 10-72777, Adv. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:41 am by Altman & Altman
Their parent company, NiSource Inc., was forced to sell the business, which was bought recently by Eversource. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 11:11 am by Rosa Schechter
The ability to connect those looking to buy or rent Florida real estate by connecting them via social media technology may be more than a trend, it may be a solid way to find buyers and renters for properties in Florida, both residential and commercial. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Here, there was no evidence that anyone "foresaw, or expected, or would have intended, the reaction between bortezomib and mannitol, or that the resulting ester would have the long-sought properties and advantages" and hence the invention was non-obvious.link: http://www.patentdocs.org/2017/07/millennium-pharmaceuticals-inc-v-sandoz-inc-fed-cir-2017.htmlIPBiz notes that obviousness relates to that which is known or reasonably foreseeable. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company, 505 F.3d 401 (6th Cir. 2007), and Freeman v. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:10 am
L&P Property Management Co., Opposition No. 91151220 [Likelihood of confusion between Applicant's mark HARTEX for carpet underlay, and Opposer's mark HARTEX for pale crepe rubber and natural latex rubber].January 16, 2007 - 10 AM: In re Wieland Dental + Technik GmbH, Serial No. 76514103 [Section 2(d) refusal of REFLEX for veneering material for dental use, in view of the identical registered mark for orthodontic appliances].January 17, 2007 - 10 AM: In re McTech Group,… [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:39 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Decision of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal The Court of Appeal reviewed the seminal decisions of Cardozo J. in Jacob & Youngs Inc. v. [read post]