Search for: "Solid Property, Inc. " Results 81 - 100 of 343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2018, 8:05 am by Law Office of James J. Falcone
They claim that M&M represented that this was a solid income producing property, and that the tenant was required to pay the property taxes. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:12 am by Simon Holzer
Until recently, Switzerland stood solid as a rock and defended the so-called infringement test for SPCs for combination products. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
The Turtles ongoing tri-state litigation against SiriusXM over the satellite radio broadcaster's refusal to pay to broadcast pre-1972 sound recordings reached the the Florida Supreme Court, who looked again at Judge Darrin Gayle's decision which found in favour of SiriusXM and agreed that "There is no specific Florida legislation covering sound recording property rights, nor is there a bevy of case law interpreting common law copyright related to the arts" and… [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 9:55 pm by Patent Docs
" (Intellectual Property Owners Association) - 2:00 to 3:00 pm (ET) October 26, 2017 - "Drug Substance Patents: FDA Guidance, Protecting Composition-of-Matter Patents, Drafting Solid Form Claims" (Strafford) - 1:00 to 2:30 pm (EDT) October 26, 2017 - "Taking Another Bite at the Apple: Multiple Proceedings Before the PTAB Involving the Same Patent" (Federal Circuit Bar Association) - 1:00 pm to 2:00 pm (EDT) October 27, 2017 - "Aqua Products,… [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
So, what is most important in this bill has less to do with property than with honor. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Here, there was no evidence that anyone "foresaw, or expected, or would have intended, the reaction between bortezomib and mannitol, or that the resulting ester would have the long-sought properties and advantages" and hence the invention was non-obvious.link: http://www.patentdocs.org/2017/07/millennium-pharmaceuticals-inc-v-sandoz-inc-fed-cir-2017.htmlIPBiz notes that obviousness relates to that which is known or reasonably foreseeable. [read post]