Search for: "Solo Cup Operating Corporation" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am by Woodrow Pollack
Solo Cup won that case on summary judgment -- there was no question that Solo Cup did not intend to deceive the public by marking its cups with expired patent numbers.Most defendants present this argument, but it is not an argument you can win at the pleading stage. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:59 pm by FDABlog HPM
Solo Cup Co. in a June 2010 decision in which the Court held that that a rebuttable presumption of intent to deceive under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 8:56 pm by Daniel Richardson
  Even so, much like America’s favorite peanut butter cup, it really didn’t matter who put what where; the combination of the two was better than each ingredient solo. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am by Kelly
Not Faber-Castell (IPKat) US Patents – Decisions Check the corporate records – every time: CAFC decision in Tri-Star Elecs. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:01 pm by Jackie Hutter, IP Strategist
A word of warning: this is a long article that reflects considerable thought about this topic, and it is likely best read while having a cup of coffee or over lunch. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:01 pm by Jackie Hutter, IP Strategist
A word of warning: this is a long article that reflects considerable thought about this topic, and it is likely best read while having a cup of coffee or over lunch. [read post]