Search for: "Sony Music Holding, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2011, 8:59 am
") on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in LG Electronics Inc v Sony Europe Ltd, Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc and Sony Corporation. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:40 am by Terry Hart
” A touch over thirty years later, the Court was asked to look at the liability of companies that provided software that allowed peer-to-peer trading of computer files in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 10:48 am
Billions more are spent on music and other downloadable digital media. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:19 am by Mike Madison
Holdings, Inc., 931 F. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:07 am by Terry Hart
The court did note it was bound by Sony‘s holding regarding substantial noninfringing purposes and would not “impute the requisite level of knowledge to Napster merely because peer-to-peer file sharing technology may be used to infringe plaintiffs’ copyrights” However, the court explained “Napster’s actual, specific knowledge of direct infringement renders Sony‘s holding of limited assistance to Napster. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:22 am by Devlin Hartline
Sony case controls the standing analysis. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am by Ray Dowd
Eagle Rock Ent., Inc., 655 F.Supp.2d 779, 2009 WL 2923173, at *7-8 (E.D.Mich.2009) (musician's publicity and appropriation claims against music video distributor preempted by Copyright Act where case involved live musical performance recorded on videotape); see also 17 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
The BPI, which represents the three major recorded music labels, Universal, Sony and Warner as well as many independent labels, sent its first takedown request to Google in July 2011. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Court granted summary judgment to defendants because (1) online music service provider's automatic mix feature did not infringe patent; and (2) internet radio did not infringe patent.Paltalk Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Hulu) http://t.co/FcBypcfwL1 -> US 1st Circuit affirms statutory damage award in Sony BMG v Tenenbaum http://t.co/ssyPB54Q82 -> Search of computer reasonable R. v. [read post]