Search for: "Standard Benefit Administrators" Results 1 - 20 of 12,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2011, 12:47 am
The Plaintiff, Veronica C., worked as an Executive Administrative Assistant for the Cliff Castle Casino dba Yavapai Apache Nation (Cliff Castle Casino), who contracted with Standard Insurance Company of New York to provide long-term disability benefit payments. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:00 pm by Eric D. Altholz
The fiduciary standards of ERISA apply to all employee benefit plans that are subject to Title I of ERISA. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm by Rena Steinzor
But, said the Trump Administration, we should not count that number. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:04 am by Bill Bellew, Aptia
The post <strong>The Evolving Role of AI in Benefits Administration</strong> appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 12:48 pm
We have talked a lot about the different standards of review that courts should apply when reviewing an administrator's decision concerning a claim for benefits under ERISA. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 5:57 am by Disability Lawyers Dell &#38; Schaefer
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Reliance) demonstrates the length disability insurance companies will go to avoid paying benefits to claimants. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:02 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Defense lawyers pressed this point in benefit litigation for years before it really became the standard mode of operating for many trial judges, and the reason was simple. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:57 am by John Fullerton III
Tax Aspects of Qualified Retirement Plans Can Save Money For Both Employers and Employees The Benefits of a Contractual Claims Limitation Period The Benefits of a Contractual Venue Selection Clause The Standard of Judicial Review in the Context of Top Hat Plan Benefit Disputes Fiduciary Exception to the Attorney-Client Privilege in Plan Administration Read the full newsletter here. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:39 am by Michael F. McGahan
Tax Aspects of Qualified Retirement Plans Can Save Money For Both Employers and Employees The Benefits of a Contractual Claims Limitation Period The Benefits of a Contractual Venue Selection Clause The Standard of Judicial Review in the Context of Top Hat Plan Benefit Disputes Fiduciary Exception to the Attorney-Client Privilege in Plan Administration Read the full newsletter here. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm by Mary E. Hodges
ERISA requires employers to implement certain safeguards for employee benefit plans by setting minimum standards for things such as for participation, vesting, benefit accrual, funding, and reporting. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:04 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Massey Seyfarth Synopsis: It remains to be seen whether the Trump administration will redirect its enforcement priorities away from independent contractor misclassification issues or curtail the applicable standards in the coming years. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 8:52 am by Disability Lawyers Dell &#38; Schaefer
But Standard policyholders may find actually qualifying for benefits to be a bit of an uphill battle. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:50 am by Len Feltoon
Standards for Group Legal Plans A good legal benefit has three main components: Excellent Legal Counsel. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 7:49 pm by Sheri Abrams
Gross Income Certain disability-related payments, Veterans Administration disability benefits, and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are excluded from gross income. 3. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 1:55 pm by Mehr Fairbanks Trial Lawyers
Some courts use a modified summary judgment standard unique to ERISA denial-of-benefits cases that are based exclusively on an administrative record and the non-moving party is generally not entitled to the usual inferences in its favor (unlike the traditional summary judgment standard). [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 4:01 pm by Matt Pulle
This type of letter can be challenged in court as evidence that the plan administrator’s denial of disability benefits was arbitrary and capricious, and should be overturned. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:09 am
It involves what otherwise would seem to be a remarkably unnoteworthy issue, namely the right of the plan administrator - an insurer who also administered the plan - to offset from the benefit amount the estimated value of social security benefits that the claimant would have received but for the fact that the claimant never applied for them. [read post]