Search for: "Standard Complaint Test"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 7:43 am
The guidelines have not yet been tested in court. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:53 am
Nonetheless, the complaint sufficiently alleged infringement. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
The complaint says iHeartMedia’s donations qualify as “soft money” solicited or directed from Cruz. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:18 pm
Unless you are a high-paid telecom lawyer who bills by the hour, the proposed test for what’s a good or bad fast lane is a nightmare. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
Today The petitioner in Vanda cites De Forest Radio as applying a lower standard for inventiveness than the Federal Circuit’s current “reasonable expectation of success” test for obviousness. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm
Responsible for maintaining the community rules, facilities, and appearance, homeowners’ associations have an important role in upholding community standards. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm
Responsible for maintaining the community rules, facilities, and appearance, homeowners’ associations have an important role in upholding community standards. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:38 am
The Act would direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) to facilitate the development of standards for identifying and labeling AI-generated content, including through technical measures such as provenance metadata, watermarking, and digital fingerprinting. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:59 am
" Under the minimal pleading standards in the Second Circuit, most recently outlined in Buon v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
Starbucks is asking if courts must evaluate injunctions under a traditional, stringent four-factor test for preliminary injunctions or under some other more lenient standard. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:44 pm
The Final Rule does, however, specify that requiring the individual to comply with specific legal obligations, satisfy health and safety standards, carry insurance, meet contractually agreed-upon deadlines or quality control standards, or satisfy other similar terms that are typical of contractual relationships between businesses, would not indicate an employee relationship for purposes of the DOL’s economic reality test. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am
Nebraska); the COVID-19 vaccine-or-test mandate (NFIB v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
And that discussion applied a "credible threat" standard, consistent with settled case law. . . . [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:37 am
The standard for this issue is whether FIT knew about the harassment but "did nothing about" it. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
Draft Framework Convention on the design, development, use, and decommissioning of artificialintelligence systems based on the Council of Europe standards on human rights, democracy and therule of law, as well as other relevant international legal standards, and conducive to innovation, inaccordance with the relevant decisions of the Committee of Ministers. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 3:25 pm
This pattern of "citation misrepresentation," the complaint alleges, violates Stanford’s standards of professional conduct for faculty, showing a disregard for accuracy, and may violate the university's research integrity rules. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 7:08 am
These decisions established a test for proving a hostile work environment claim: – The conduct was based on a protected category. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 4:27 am
To achieve this, its three key focus areas are: reducing and preventing serious harm, setting and testing higher standards, and promoting competition and positive change. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
Tagging AI training content may prove less challenging than, say, scanning all the books in the world’s libraries.[18] For one, such tagging could leverage existing metadata so as to drive scale, and take advantage of existing standardization so as to promote interoperability across platforms, as well as traceability for misinformation researchers and public safety officials. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
At the time, we noted that this case is a litmus test for the “reasonable consumer” standard. [read post]
