Search for: "Standard Innovation (US) Corp."
Results 141 - 160
of 789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2015, 8:20 am
Patents of the highest quality can help to stimulate and promote efficient licensing, research and development, and future innovation without resorting to needless high-cost court proceedings. [read post]
16 May 2013, 1:03 am
” [Chiron Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:38 am
§ 282(a);Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:56 am
Epic Systems Corp. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
To facilitate its use, Sun also developed the Java SE (Standard Edition) Application Programming Interface (API). [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
Novartis Pharmaceutical Corp., 2013 WL 4648449 (M.D. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:31 pm
Here's an overview of the reports I've seen so far (in alphabetical order):AllThingsD: "Court Denies Motorola the Billions It Wanted From Microsoft for Standards-Essential Patents"ArsTechnica: "Court shreds power of Motorola’s standard-based patents"BBC: "US judge slashes $4bn Google royalty claim on Xbox" "Google's claim that Microsoft owes it billions in patent payments has been rebuffed by a US judge." [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:34 am
” The article leverages the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp., which dramatically tightened patent eligibility standards for business-methods software, to compare outcomes for patent applications decided just before and after the decision. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
Kappos explains the "essential purpose" for the USPTO's use of broadest reasonable claim interpretation and how switching to a stricter standard would, "impair the efficient operation of the Office and result in facially inconsistent results, as well as constitute bad policy for our country's IP system. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
Kappos explains the "essential purpose" for the USPTO's use of broadest reasonable claim interpretation and how switching to a stricter standard would, "impair the efficient operation of the Office and result in facially inconsistent results, as well as constitute bad policy for our country's IP system. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
The recent past provides a lesson: What if decisions almost ten years ago about whether to seek patent protection on vital software innovations relied solely on the Patent Office’s first positions on Alice Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 8:05 am
Cyber Corps Another major tenet of CNAP is dedicated to increasing the resources available to the federal government to build the cybersecurity workforce it needs to advance. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 8:05 am
Cyber Corps Another major tenet of CNAP is dedicated to increasing the resources available to the federal government to build the cybersecurity workforce it needs to advance. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Highlights this week included: ISO moving to create a global standard for patent valuation, Vonage and Nortel settling their patent suit and the establishment press taking on the RIAA.Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let me know if you think we've missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2015-02-07: Zebra Stripes and Polka Dots May be Protected by US C… http://t.co/Q34uSN7aCA -> Jurisdiction simplicitor in copyright Geophysical Service Incorporated v Arcis Seismic Solutions Corp, 2015 ABQB 88 http://t.co/kLDKVTFk8u -> Jurisdiction in tort claims Candoo Excavating Services Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:29 pm
All business environments can leverage the robust IP system to help protect innovation and creativity. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
Then we find this:Regulatory status does not provide a clear line between standard and innovative uses of medical products. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 947 F. [read post]
AI and inventorship guidance: Incentivizing human ingenuity and investment in AI-assisted inventions
12 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
Iolab Corp., 155 F.3d 1344 (Fed. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPEG) Is the lesson of the last few weeks that we need IP valuation standards? [read post]
