Search for: "Starbuck's Corporation"
Results 41 - 60
of 237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2018, 12:30 pm
The EU General Court [official website] on Tuesday reinstated [decision, PDF] a four-year-old trademark infringement complaint filed by Starbucks [corporate website] against a Belgian coffeehouse whose musical-note signage is accused of infringing the iconic mermaid logo. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
In the case Starbucks Corporation vs Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha [2017] SGIPOS 18, Starbucks opposed the registration of a mark by the Japanese dairy company, based on alleged similar layout. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:17 am
Rainier would mislead consumers into thinking that the applicant's goods originate from Seattle. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 2:10 am
"…the work must be an expression of the author's own intellectual creation". [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:37 am
The program takes place in a studio (and in location: street, shopping mall or unexpected at people's homes). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:30 am
The program takes place in a studio (and in location: street, shopping mall or unexpected at people's homes). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
CERT's complaint is that these businesses failed to warn customers of potentially harmful, carcinogenic chemicals in coffee, specifically acrylamide. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:55 am
Been away and want to catch up on last week's IP news? [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:26 am
It's hard to imagine any of Star Box's London customers mistook the kiosk for Starbucks. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 5:21 pm
Starbucks Corporation (S234969). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 1:42 pm
Goodyear's attorneys turned over some tests to the Haeger's attorneys, but they argued that "all relevant testing" was too broad a term. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
It's here now. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 11:10 am
Starbucks has been in the forefront of this consumer revolution. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 6:58 am
This year's programme is designed to appeal to registrants who hunt in packs, since the registration package includes a "buy two, get one free" offer [don't worry: there's no way of spotting which of the three is the freebie]. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 6:50 am
Slate's Jordan Weissmann gets this one right, I think:"First, it's obvious that copyright is a sideshow here. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
Once again we have the privilege of being able to depend on the wonderful services of our dear Katfriend Alberto Bellan, for carefully preparing this week's round-up of last week's substantive Katposts. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
No, it's more important than that. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
This week's collection is the 53rd. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:08 am
No, because Hayuk's art looks uglier than Starbucks coffee tastes burnt. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:45 pm
Was Morningstar unwilling to invest in new technology in order to meet the legal market's demand for content integrated with process improvement. [read post]
