Search for: "Starbucks Coffee Company"
Results 41 - 60
of 509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2010, 9:52 pm
What started as a lighter version of Starbucks coffee has taken a different tack. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:41 pm
The 20-ounce water bottles have the words “Glass Water Bottle” printed on a blue label affixed to the bottle.Sold at: Starbucks company-operated stores and at Starbucks locations in Safeway and Target stores nationwide during January 2010 for about $9.Manufactured in: TaiwanRemedy: Consumers should immediately stop using the glass water bottles and return the product to the Starbucks location where purchased to receive a full refund. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
Here’s more from the Starbucks press release: Starbucks Coffee Company (NASDAQ: SBUX) today announced it will be closing its more than 8,000 company-owned stores in the United States on the afternoon of May 29 to conduct racial-bias education geared toward preventing discrimination in our stores. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
Here’s more from the Starbucks press release: Starbucks Coffee Company (NASDAQ: SBUX) today announced it will be closing its more than 8,000 company-owned stores in the United States on the afternoon of May 29 to conduct racial-bias education geared toward preventing discrimination in our stores. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
Among other things, the coffee giant had attained 100% gender and racial equality and announced investments in paid leave. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
In a recent visit to some Starbucks in Denver, it was subtly apparent that the Company was putting greater emphasis on Social Responsibility and on health. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:43 am
After all, this is home to Starbucks, Seattle’s Best Coffee, and Tully’s, among others. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 9:36 am
Carly Simon is suing Starbuck's over the poor sales of her album, "This Kind of Love," which is available via the coffee company's stores. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 12:15 pm
As an aside, we have noted that Starbucks is behind the curve in failing to provide free Internet, something done at almost every other coffee shop (and numerous other merchants). [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 9:01 am
” In a 7-year-old case against Starbucks and others, a group called the Council for Education and Research on Toxics “says coffee companies violated a state law requiring they warn consumers about a chemical created in the roasting process that could cause cancer. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:52 am
Starbucks' response, to be sure, was incommensurate with the problem: Rather than subject their employees to the ritual farce of sensitivity training, the company should spend money on high-quality coffee beans, and roast them lightly rather than burn them into acidic volcanic ash. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:14 pm
It will be interesting to see how long it takes for the company to remove the patent number once expired (in 2012..). [read post]
20 May 2018, 10:54 am
(Star Tribune) via hotair.com Well this is going to make some Starbucks unusable. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 3:39 pm
It's probably unlikely that bad practices will evolve at a restaurant chain like Starbucks, particularly since that company has a good labor record. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 9:12 pm
It does not mock Starbucks or offer any comment on the company the mark represents; it merely makes use of the company’s familar trademark. [read post]
10 May 2008, 5:15 am
To the extent coffee drinkers think they are improving the world through the purchase of a Starbucks latte, they will be less likely to abandon the company when similar products start to flow at places like McDonalds. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 1:35 pm
The company buys coffee from in-country co-ops that encourage better farming practices and create better prices for producers. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:00 am
This Dumb Starbucks was real, and Starbucks was “looking into it” according to a company spokesperson. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:13 am
The court expressed its concern that preventing the use of the Charbucks mark would give Starbucks too broad a right to exclude any mark that troubled Starbucks, something not provided for under law, even where defendant intended to associate its coffee with Starbucks'. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:36 pm
(“Starbucks”) in a wage/hour lawsuit filed by former and current baristas of Starbucks’s coffee shops located in New York. [read post]
