Search for: "Starbucks Corporation"
Results 21 - 40
of 684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2023, 8:21 am
Why would someone working from a Starbucks in Shenzhen bother dealing with China’s onerous company formation requirements, when they can just arrange to have a company set up in a tropical paradise for a few hundred dollars? [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 8:02 am
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Dist. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Courts of law have no business involving themselves with reasonable and legal decisions made by the board of directors of public corporations…It is clear Plaintiff is pursuing its personal interests rather than those of Starbucks. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:57 am
Corporate Governance: In the wake of corporate scandals like Enron, business negligence law has prompted increased scrutiny of corporate governance practices. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:57 am
Corporate Governance: In the wake of corporate scandals like Enron, business negligence law has prompted increased scrutiny of corporate governance practices. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 2:05 am
For example, in Starbucks Corporation, the NLRB held that two Starbucks employees who had covertly recorded conversations of management without their consent were engaged in protected activity under the NLRA. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Washington recently addressed this particular issue in its dismissal of discrimination claims brought against Starbucks’ DEI policies. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Washington recently addressed this particular issue in its dismissal of discrimination claims brought against Starbucks’ DEI policies. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
It’s something for corporations to decide. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
” The law firm memo quotes the judge in the Starbucks case as saying that “the plaintiffs have ignored the fundamental rules of corporate law, including the business judgment rule. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:37 am
This is not the only ongoing effort to end DEI practices in corporate America. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:43 am
Indeed, the Wall Street Journal reports (here) that this lawsuit was brought by the plaintiff shareholder at the initiative of a group called the Free Enterprise Project – a group that is also responsible for the lawsuit filed last year against Starbucks’ board of directors accusing the them of breach of fiduciary duty for supporting corporate diversity policies. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 9:43 am
Now they are going after diversity initiatives widely deployed across American corporations. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 5:58 am
[Corporate Counsel] * Starbucks can't fire people just for being pro-union. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:32 pm
Those are easy, too – just think of Nike’s Swoosh, or the Starbucks mermaid, or the Mercedes Benz hood ornament. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 5:09 am
” What that corporate chairman wanted, of course, was influence. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
In a forthcoming article, titled Racial Targets, I address the legal status and defensibility of corporate hiring and promotion pledges. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
In a forthcoming article, titled Racial Targets, I address the legal status and defensibility of corporate hiring and promotion pledges. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:58 am
For example, Starbucks has registered their name, logo, and other signs as service trademarks for their café and coffeehouse franchises – and it has also registered the same as trademarks in connection with their physical products, for example, coffee bags, mugs, etc. [read post]
