Search for: "Stat Medical Devices, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
E/C authorized these medical providers as primary care physicians: Port of Miami Medical Clinic/Irwin M. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Thus the rule reflects how prescription drugs and medical devices are actually distributed. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Bear Medical Systems, Inc., 883 P.2d 407, 415 (Ariz. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Feb. 13, 1986), and generally required product identification as an essential element in other product-related litigation involving prescription medical products. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 11:58 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A different three-judge panel on Sept. 1 said information of a clinical trial wasn’t evidence that could be used to challenge Biogen Inc. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm by Bexis
Danek Medical, Inc., 520 S.E.2d 88, 92 (N.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Occlutech (Kluwer Patent Blog) Greece Court of Appeal Thessaloniki: Patent covering ornamental light device lacks novelty and inventive step: Palaiochorinos S.A. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:15 am by Bill Marler
Hronis, Inc., a Delano, California company was the producer. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am by Roy Ginsburg
  Regards, Roy] Quirky Question # 196: I am the general counsel of a corporation in the medical device industry. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Comment k says unavoidably unsafe products are “especially common” in the context of prescription medical products (actually, it says “drugs” but “medical devices” weren’t recognized as a separate category of products in the early 1960s – the Medical Device Amendments still being more than a decade in the future). [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am by David W.S. Lieberman
 As a result, patients receive goods and services that are medically inappropriate, unduly costly, medically unnecessary, and of poor quality. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism (IAM) The… [read post]