Search for: "State ex rel. v. Christopher B."
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that… [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
Discovery Radiology Physicians, P.C.; Allstate Insurance Company, The People ex rel. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
Christopher Anderson, et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
A: this is part of the challenge—innovation folks usually don’t have to think about public law and state v. federal. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Figure 1: B. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 2:24 pm
Behrens & Christopher E. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Bookstores, g., United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Plaintiff,v.MOSS LAW FIRM, P.C., Defendant.Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-2449-D.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
The key participants, including FBI agents and supervisors, and Christopher Steele, were interviewed. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 12:04 pm
The legal threshold for initiating a probe is low; and according to the OIG report, the “predication” (i.e., support) for the probe easily met this relatively undemanding standard. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 8:30 am
This has included a $280 million settlement in United States of America ex rel Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm
Begbie at p.1124A-B). [read post]
