Search for: "State ex rel. v. Christopher B."
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Plaintiff,v.MOSS LAW FIRM, P.C., Defendant.Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-2449-D.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Christopher Miller v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
A: this is part of the challenge—innovation folks usually don’t have to think about public law and state v. federal. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 12:04 pm
The legal threshold for initiating a probe is low; and according to the OIG report, the “predication” (i.e., support) for the probe easily met this relatively undemanding standard. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
As I noted on Lawfare, the court ignored the most relevant precedent, United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 2:24 pm
Behrens & Christopher E. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
NEW PRIME, INC., and Christopher L. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Figure 1: B. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am
Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
See, e.g., Christopher B. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm
” In last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Bookstores, g., United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
” Jack B. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Instead of veering towards such a transformation, the government decided to rely once again on its preferred model, stimulating growth through investment, exports and subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), operating outside of China on a regional scale, via BRI. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
The key participants, including FBI agents and supervisors, and Christopher Steele, were interviewed. [read post]
