Search for: "State ex rel. v. Christopher B." Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
As I noted on Lawfare, the court ignored the most relevant precedent, United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Instead of veering towards such a transformation, the government decided to rely once again on its preferred model, stimulating growth through investment, exports and subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), operating outside of China on a regional scale, via BRI. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am by Barbara Bavis
  Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 6:58 am by Susan Brenner
State, supra (quoting Indiana Code § 35-45-10-5(b)). [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:53 am by Frank Pasquale
What happens if Google purchases Company B, and immediately after the purchase, Company B appears to dominate the first page of results on Google, and your company has been relegated to later pages? [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:01 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Oddy v Morris, 2012 WL 464227 (D.Hawaii) Christopher Oddy ("Petitioner") filed an Emergency Verified Petition for Return of Children to the United Kingdom. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]