Search for: "State of Georgia v. Adams" Results 61 - 80 of 335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2011, 7:19 am by Steve Hall
Georgia and other states had in the meantime enacted provisions meant to address discrimination in capital punishment. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
Three and a half months later, at the end of March, the Court heard oral argument in cases from five states (Texas, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Louisiana) that had enacted new death penalty laws after the Court's 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:17 am by Adam Thimmesch
By Adam Thimmesch The major question presented in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am by Nabiha Syed
Northwest Environmental Defense Center and Georgia-Pacific West v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:40 pm
The State - Homeless Sex Offender ChallengeBelow this message are a couple articles about the case that was argued in the Georgia Supreme Court this past Monday, Santos V. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
 A "Curator Talk" at the FDR Presidential Library and Museum, Japanese American Incarceration Through the Lens of Ansel Adams, is now on YouTube. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:01 am by Amy Howe
In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh analyzes the Court’s recent decision in Luis v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Jander, which involves claims against pension-fund fiduciaries, and Georgia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm by admin
United States and Black v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
She says that though John Adams (and his son John Quincy Adams, who was not a founding father) objected to slavery, the other founding fathers did own slaves. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:40 am
The Georgia Supreme Court heard arguments today concerning whether the state's sex-offender registry law is unconstitutional. [read post]