Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 1 - 20
of 20,873
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
Mular v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm
According to the Second Circuit, a "rare circumstance" under the Hague Convention where a court can order the return of a child to a parent who is "temporarily in a third country. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:00 am
That was the argument before the Florida Supreme Court in the case of Malicki v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:00 pm
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 12:09 pm
United States (Bankruptcy Discharge; McGirt v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:10 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:17 pm
The Canadian Supreme Court, in R v Simard, also rejected using lyrics as evidence. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:25 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court recently applied the narrow and relatively new anticommandeering doctrine for the first time to federal Indian Affairs legislation in Halaand v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:39 am
A.J.Z. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:21 am
Blanford v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:40 am
This case centered on a child’s right to meaningful access to expert assistance at State expense when defending against waiver to adult court. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:35 am
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court recently applied the narrow and relatively new anticommandeering doctrine for the first time to federal Indian Affairs legislation in Halaand v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:18 pm
Doe, a child under 14 years old. [read post]
12 May 2024, 7:37 am
Carpin v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am
” People v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:56 am
From North Carolina Lawyers Weekly: The trial court did not have a legal basis to order plaintiff to pay child support. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
