Search for: "State v. Godwin" Results 21 - 40 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am by INFORRM
  In such circumstances, and against the backdrop of the law generally in this field being in a state of rapid flux at this time, the Court of Appeal in Greene might certainly be forgiven if, with the benefit of hindsight, it appears that it failed to apply Re S correctly. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:59 am by Leiza Dolghih
Leiza DolghihAttorney, Godwin Lewis PC The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals started the new year with a quick civil procedure lesson, ruling yesterday in Vantage Drilling Company v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Becerra (challenge to California law requiring “crisis pregnancy centers” to convey state-prescribed messages), Lozman v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 1:00 am
The May 8 judgment in South African Litigation Centre et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:03 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 1 July 2021, the High Court handed down judgment in the long-running libel action of Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Others [2021] EWHC 1797 (QB). [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:42 am by SHG
After learning of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:29 am by Shea Denning
The Godwin court rejected the State’s argument that State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm by Timothy Zick
Godwin, Jr., Professor of Law at William & Mary Law School. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 8:45 pm by David Bernstein
Vinson’s opinion hasn’t provoked Common Cause to demonstrate/riot in front of a hotel, much less a war.So Vinson’s opinion is almost exactly like Scott v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 7:17 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Sarah Grant reported the latest from the military commission in United States v. [read post]