Search for: "State v. Pittman" Results 101 - 120 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Peebles, 893 P.2d 138,154-155 (Haw. 1995); Pittman v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
  Granted, it's only recognized in Louisiana, but there's no case out there stating flat out that Pennsylvania (or probably most other states) refuse to recognize it. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:05 am by SOIssues
Delaware's juvenile sex offender statute "is ruining the next generation," Pittman told a joint meeting of the state House and Senate judiciary committees on March 31. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 1:31 pm by Kalvis Golde
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP 22-18Issue: Whether a federal court deciding a state-law issue in a bankruptcy case must apply the forum state’s choice-of-law rules or federal choice-of-law rules to determine what substantive law governs. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:40 pm
Florida, being argued at 10, and Sullivan v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 9:43 pm
I’ve read Judge Pittman’s Superior Court Decision in Kerrigan v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:00 pm by LawDiva
Melissa’s father lost his lawsuit.The Court relied on the 1998 decision of Pittman v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 9:14 pm by Dan Flynn
The federal Western District Court for Texas calls the United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am by John Elwood
And I was half right about Pittman v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 3:22 am by SHG
It will be very interesting to see whether Judge Pittman bites. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:03 am
The Court took no action Monday on a major new test case on criminal sentencing — the case of Pittman v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:56 pm by Amy Howe
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, involving what law a federal court deciding a state-law issue in a bankruptcy case should apply; and Teva Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:41 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Upjohn Co., 890 S.W.2d 425, 434 (Tenn. 1994) (stating pharmacists have duty to exercise standard of care required of pharmacy profession in same or similar communities); Schaerrer v. [read post]