Search for: "State v. Rowland"
Results 161 - 180
of 188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
As noted in a decision in late 2017, “’having chosen to obtain patent protection, [the plaintiff] forfeited any right to claim a trade secret” (Rowland v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:44 am
Kay v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
While Zalewska v Department for Social Development (Northern Ireland) [2008] UKHL 67 is not a housing case as such, I hope that many of our readers will still find this useful and interesting. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 12:37 pm
Postmates Inc., July 20, 2020, Rowland, M.). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:13 am
Constitutional law » United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In both swing states and safe seats, Republicans say liberals hate them personally and may turn rioters or a police state on people who disobey them. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 7:48 am
An overholding clause in a lease often contains the following features: Specifying whether overholding requires the landlord’s explicit, written consent (for further discussion of this principle, see this bulletin prepared by our colleague Bill Rowlands);[13] Stating the outcome if the landlord does not consent to overholding; The basic rent and additional rent payable during overholding; The term of the lease during overholding, commonly month-to-month; and Whether certain… [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm
In the Courts On Monday 24 March 2014 Tugendhat J heard applications for third party disclosure in the linked “Plebgate” cases of Mitchell v News Group and Rowland v Mitchell. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
”[14] After certification, the union is the one and only party that can bargain for all employees, including those who did not vote for the certification of the union.[15] The extent of this bargaining power is noteworthy: in Falconbridge, the union was assumed to have the power to effectively waive the ESA on behalf of its employees regardless of the individual employees knowledge or consent to such a concession with potential adverse effect on the employees.[16] It is… [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:02 pm
[v] The U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
These included: Chris Bryant (MP); Sadie Frost; HJK; Gavin Henson; Ben Jackson; Jude Law; Denis MacShane; Ciara Parkes; Guy Pelly; John Prescott; Tom Rowland; Christopher Shipman; and Joan Smith. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 12:57 am
Supreme Court eminent domain case Kelo v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
" See, e.g., State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 7:27 pm
DePyper v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:25 pm
In the context of a recent reference to the European Court of Justice from the English Court (Case C-127/04, O’Byrne v Sanofi Pasteur MDS Limited and Sanofi Pasteur SA) Advocate-General Geelhoed stated in his opinion that “if the supplier is erroneously sued as the producer, he should immediately inform the suing party as to the identity of the producer… If he were to fail to do so, by analogy with Article 3(3) of the Directive he should be treated as… [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:25 pm
Rowland: there have been cases similar to the New York one in states like Connecticut [in 1999], Indiana, Minnesota, Montana [in 2005] and Washington, with settlements, lower court decisions and inconsistent rulings. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
They are Hewitt v Rowlands (1924) 93 LJKB 1080, Calabar Properties v Stitcher [1984] 1 WLR 287 , Wallace v Manchester City Council (1998) 30 HLR 1111 and Earle v Charalambous [2007] HLR 8. [read post]
